Monday, February 13, 2023

ChatGPT vs IP

 

DABUS wasn’t considered as the Inventor as it wasn’t the Natural Person.

What about the content created by ChatGPT? The human input or ChatGPT itself or OPEN AI, Who exactly owns that content?

In one of my earlier blogs, I discussed the case of AI being an Inventor citing example of DABUS. In the case of ChatGPT, I decided to converse with it (conversations assembled in several pages). One of the questions I asked it was to write a poetry on a particular subject. It generated an output (a poem), as anticipated. I repeated the question, but now on a slightly different subject. It generated another new poem but this time with few repeated lines taken from the previous ones.

Thanks To The Hon’ble Munich Court For Upholding The Fact That AI Companies Training Their Modules SANS Permission Is An Act Of Infringement!

  The AI companies’ submissions that only USER is responsible for the infringement, as the USER entered a specific PROMPT, can be held a VAL...